After six years of horror were brought to a close by the atomic bomb, (I am speaking of course of WWII) the new daub in society and the companionship base required a abstruse change in art, which discarded traditional rules and provided the expected trace between techniques of expression almost meaningless. From this point on it is no longer possible to speak of painting: a disparate horizon opens, one that the masterpieces anticipated solely which new artists atomic number 18 now tackling, in unpredictable styluss; Modern Art. on that point is an analogy to the history of art. Modernism in art mark a point before which painters set about representing the world the way it presented itself, painting people and landscapes and historical events just as they would present themselves to the eye. With modernism, the conditions of representation themselves become central, so that art in a way becomes its own subject. This was almost precisely the way in which Clement Greenberg defined the matter in his noted 1960 essay Modernist Painting. The essence of Modernism, he wrote, lies, as I hang it, in the use of the characteristic methods of a discipline to ping the discipline itself, not in order to subvert it but in order to entrench it more firmly in its area of competence.
Interestingly, Greenberg took as his model of modernist thought the philosopher Immanuel Kant: Because he was the get-go to criticize the means itself of criticism, I conceive of Kant as the initial real Modernist. Kant did not see philosophy as adding to our acquaintance so much as respondent the question of how knowledge was possible. And I suppose the corresponding view of painting would own been not to represent the appearances of things so much as answering the question of how painting was possible
Modern art is a...
If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment