The readings from the past two weeks have been incredibly applicable to my casual life and when it comes to the organizing work I do. Lately, I have been having umteen conversations with non-politicized people (especially some friends and family members as of late) about the idea that the sexuality dichotomy system is arbitrary. I find that they have a tough time grasping the idea that there isnt a natural need for the human sexes to be polar and laudatory opposites. The concepts of the natural differences between body strength, flexibility, estrogen/testosterone production, and the worlds need for stipulate gender roles continually come up.
I have had a hard time combating the argument that testosterone and estrogen be the earths that men are aggressive while women are passive, men are much violent while women are nurturing and docile, and that men arent supposed to be emotional whilst women are.
I know that these hormones have a generate in contributing to these characteristics, but the idea that people of ad hoc sexes are all the same, or that we are powerless and goaded solely by hormonal drives, is absurd. Socialization is the main reason that people become who they are in the long run.
Now I feel like I have some texts that result back up my arguments when presenting them to a stubborn scientific mind. It is too good to have a concise history of the origins of the sign labeling of homosexuality.
If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment