The growing issue of violence in American society evokes many discussions regarding highly effective measures that could decrease violence and minimize the risk with the commitment of violent crimes. It need to be pointed out how the main argument usually refers towards trouble of gun control, which is viewed by the public as the major or, at least, as probably the most potent techniques of personal protection. At the same time, issues related to gun control, individual protection equipment and use of force are closely interrelated and basically they've similar effects. At any rate, the use of weapon or other individual protection equipment inevitably raises the problem with the use of force and the principal issue arises as soon as it is necessary to adequately assess regardless of whether the use of force or own protection equipment and arms is justified and reasonable. In fact, always it is extremely hard to find the borderline among the reasonable and justified use of force as well as the excessively violent behavior which means the legal prosecution on the individual. This is why you can estimate that all these problems needs to be treated inside a complex mainly because the use of weapon, individual protection equipment and also the use of force are closely interrelated.
At the exact same time, speaking about the issue in the use of weapon, very own equipment as well as the use of force, it's hardly feasible to avoid the legal debates on these issues. To put it more precisely, the use of weapon, for instance, is controlled by the existing legislation and American citizens have the second amendment correct to bare weapon (Kates and Kleck, 1997). The same can be mentioned for the own protection equipment, which essentially targets at the replacement of firearm to be able to decrease casualties and minimize the threat towards life of men and women in case from the use of this equipment. At the exact same time, both these problems inevitably involve the use of force, that is certainly also strictly regulated by the current legislation. In this kind of a situation, it is obvious that formally the existing legislation regulates all these issues, but the issue is that the effectiveness of this kind of a regulation is argued by specialists (Kates and Kleck, 1997) along with ordinary Americans.
To put it additional precisely, the dilemma with the use of weapon and the necessity with the strengthening of gun control is broadly discussed at the produce moment. It proves beyond a doubt that weapon is a source of a good threat to the well being and life of people. This is why it's really natural that views on gun control and possibilities of use of firearm vary consistently inside total prohibition of arm selling to population to really liberal regulations with the gun market. In this respect, it should be stated how the opposite views on gun manage are determined by various methods towards use of gun by non-professional, i.e. individuals that do not use weapon in their professional work, such as police officers, military, etc.
At the same time, the trouble of gun manage is closely related to crimes that are committed with the assist of firearm. It is not a secret that many violent crimes are committed on the use of weapon. In these kinds of a situation, the gun and crime relation proves being beyond a doubt (Kellermann, 1994). In this respect, it's required to emphasize the truth that on the a single hand, weapon and crime are intertwined and interdependent as well as the product or service of both issues might be common, whereas on a other hand, some specialists (Roleff, 2003) doubt that strict gun control would prevent crimes. To put it additional precisely, the supporters with the prohibition of weapon sales argue that this will limit the access to weapon of individuals who could misuse it or use it for criminal purposes, although their opponents argue that criminals will get arms in illegal way as well as the prohibition of weapon sales and weapon possession, which indicates the violation from the second amendment, will make ordinary American defenseless in face of an armed criminal.
However, on analyzing the problem with the use of force from the application of firearm, it's also required to clearly distinguish gun accidents and self-defense. This ways that plus the legal defense, including the use of force and firearm, as well as own protection equipment, this may well also cause accidents, which has practically nothing in favorite with self-defense. In fact, cases as soon as kids or adolescents as well as adults have been injured inside the result of gun accident are not rare, whilst the use of force and weapon in terms of self-defense is justified and legally correct.
In order to minimize the risk of gun accidents and misuse of weapon, it's necessary to conduct a deep analysis and understand with the character of gun owners and also the character of those who use the gun. In this kind of a way, it is going to be feasible to decrease the quantity of accidents and crimes involving weapon use. It is quite crucial to eat into consideration own traits of character and psychological peculiarities in gun regulation acts along with acts regulating the use of individual protection equipment, which are also very harmful to your well being of persons and even trigger fatal outcomes. In this regard it's necessary to understand that gun and very own protection equipment manage isn't only social or economic dilemma but it is also a serious psychological problem.
In addition, you are able to remind that the use of weapon is closely interrelated on the difficulty of suicide that may be highly dependent on the gun ownership. The studies (Kellermann, 1992) have revealed the simple fact that people homes with gun are much more most likely being the scene of suicide than those homes without having guns. in homes in King County and Shelby County. Every property exactly where suicide was committed was compared having a ‘control’ or ‘normal’ home without suicide acts. The researchers took into consideration victims’ sex, age and race and then compared both ‘suicide’ and ‘normal’ households. They revealed the reality that were one of the most likely to presuppose, namely they found that ‘cases’ (suicides) were more likely than ‘controls’ to live alone, taken prescribe medication for depression or mental illness, drug addiction, etc. But they also found that even right after taking into consideration all these factors, keeping 1 or additional guns in the property elevated the risk of suicide act five-fold. Thus, the presence of firearms might be provocative for committing a suicide and warns gun owners about this danger.
Furthermore, the difficulty on the inability of legislators and law enforcement agencies to struggle successfully against the excessive use of force could be partially mentioned by the truth that they do not have more than enough facts about violence and its factors that result in issues in finding highly effective techniques to reduce violence. In other words, every case in the use of force ought to be assessed individually, but it is not usually feasible to discover ample criteria to assess whether the use of force or weapon or own protection equipment was justified by self-defence, or most likely it was excessive. That is why it's crucial to develop regular which could help qualify the use of force adequately.
As for your use of weapon, it needs to be mentioned that nowadays there is no method to identify or track rates of firearm related injuries that is certainly critical to the development of gun manage policy. In this regard, it is possible to recommend many ways of improvement the situation: a) to generate a fatal firearm injury reporting system; b) to continue monitoring of firearm related injuries by the National Electronic Injury Surveillance Method (NEISS), coupled with efforts to link firearm injury data with law job interview enforcement offense reports; c) to add questions about firearm injuries to interview survey; d) to refine the National Crime Victimization survey to give a clearer picture with the frequency of gun use for crime and self-defense; and, finally, e) to implement a national gun registration method to make every gun sale subject to reporting (Roleff, 2003). In reality it's required to fill in this information gap since it could prevent lots of problems, including homicide and suicide.
In this respect, it is possible to refer to a recent find out (Roleff, 2003) that was mainly based on data gathered on a territory of the USA and it reveals that really always gun is often a primary cause of numerous injuries and even deaths that occur regularly in the whole country. In terms of this study, the impact of handgun ownership over a rates of crimes in 2 big cities, Vancouver and Seattle, was researched. These two cities had very similar legislative, social and economic problems but what they have been numerous in was their technique to gun control. In Vancouver, gun manage is much less strict and citizens could relatively easy buy gun. On the contrary, in Seattle gun manage is strict and it is extremely difficult to buy gun. However, despite this critical difference, on analyzing data gathered in each cities, the researchers came for the conclusion how the rates of homicide in Seattle was 63 percent greater than in Vancouver. It is possible to explain this difference by a five-fold greater rate of firearm homicide in Seattle while non-firearms homicide rates have been practically similar. In this kind of a way, a limited entry to firearm and strict gun control might reduce the rate of homicide within the community.
No comments:
Post a Comment