Forensic Social Work

Running Head : FORENSIC SOCIAL WORKXXXXXXXXXXXXXQuestion 1 - A tender worker may be called to avow in move , and must know the differences amongst being called to rede as fact or dexterous watch in for him /her to be an effective admit . Explain the differences and similarities , if any betwixt the fact and practised witness . Include knowledge on how the roles have diverse goals methods of presentation and rules of presenting proofAnswer 1 - Here , the peg thing to nonice about is tender worker is incompatible from an advocate . Social workers can be called to philander for good word . They work for the court not for the one who retained him prattle up relies on his testimony and dependable witness of the righteousness . To rise as a fact , the testimony should hand over neat and reliable establishs like any documentary recount , material evidence , digital evidence , demonstrative evidence , or scientific evidence . As an expert witness , the social worker can use his /her expertise to declaim his views and looks on the case . He can use logics and ecumenic smack . The main difference between the fact and expert witness is , a fact is always associate to the information that is related to the case , where is the expert witnessing is opinion of that particular expert with no relation to the facts and possibilities of situations related to the case . It is answer , only if he should answer exactly what he is questioned about . The expert is forwards it simply to tell the truth and to give his opinion and what exercising weight the Board attaches to his evidence should be short no occupation of the expert ( Hodgson . 2004 ,.

6Question 2 - Jane doubting Thomas , MSW , GSW (MSW master in social work GSW generalist in social work , bordering level up from a MSW ) has been subpoenaed by the daub of Family military service to register on behalf of a squirt that has been placed in states custody . What are some of the things she should do in for her testimony to be effectiveAnswer 2 - As a Social role player , the primary focus of Jane Thomas is to operate in the best interest of the child throughout the evaluation process and court executions too . She should be aboveboard in the proceeding regardless by whom she was retained . She should not accept any of the involved participants as therapy client as it is to be undertaken with essential caution . Custody evaluation depends on the question or issue raised . The evalua tion of parents or guardians , and the child is mandatory . She has to take note of the interaction between parents /guardians and the child . To testify on behalf of a child , she should overly need a interview from the child , and interview from parents /guardian . Finally she has to chisel in reports to the parties and also to the court , and she should testify under oath as facts and she can give her expert opinion at the court . She should also be aware...If you compulsion to get a skillful essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper