Government and Politics - Promoting Global and Regional Security in the Post-Cold War World :: Exploratory Essays Research Papers

Essay is 1507 Words The post-cold War world presents an provoke paradox. Conflicts are change state increasingly local while the world is becoming increasingly interconnected although conflicts are on a sm each(prenominal)er scale, their ramifications pretend all nations. In addition, better technology means that the Ameri burn man is better informed and more eager to intervene, yet at the identical time, foreign aid is being drastically cut. The United States does non work the resources to intervene in e truly conflict or to solve all the problems in the conflicts it does intervene in. on that pointfore, the U.S. must set priorities, finding a sense of equilibrium between its national security interests and other concerns. In two cases, the drug-fueled accomplished war of Colombia and the withdrawal of North Korea from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the U.S. correctly intervened to labour regional and ball-shaped security. However, in both cases, the U.S. mistake nly limited the effects of its efforts by putting humanitarian concerns before security. Prioritizing foreign policy objectives can be difficult because there are many to choose from. umteen believe that the U.S. should act as the worlds policeman, seek to plosive consonant human rights abuses, suffer humanitarian aid, or work to build democracies. While these are sure admirable goals, the truth is that the U.S. can a great deal do little good, and sometimes aggravates the problem with intervention.1 The U.S. should instead work to promote both global and regional security. In the long run, this is the only substance to achieve the goals mentioned above. It is the best way to promote U.S. interests. Although other domestic concerns, such as building democracies or promoting human rights, should be considered in every situation (and are often integral to the problem), when these concerns conflict with the promotion of global or regional security promoting security must come f irst. The U.S. must be careful not to jeopardize its attempts to promote global and regional security because of differing domestic concerns. There is much policy overlap between pursuing regional and global security. This makes sense in order for there to be a stabilised world, there must be stability at all levels, and regional instability can quickly lead to global instability in the increasingly globalized world.2 The overlap can be most clearly seen in the objectives behind U.S. intervention in Colombia and North Korea, the fight against drugs and the fight to stop nuclear proliferation, respectively. No one doubts that drugs have negative effects on society, and when one country, such as Colombia, produces eighty percent of the worlds cocaine, drugs are very destabilizing globally.